Imagine it’s 2050. You’re standing by the ocean, watching the waves roll in, but something has changed. Scientists estimate that by then, there could be more plastic in the ocean than fish.1
It’s a striking image and one that’s pushing industries, including foodservice, to rethink packaging. Today, packaging accounts for roughly 40% of global plastic waste2, adding urgency to that shift. In response, the market has shifted quickly. Compostable containers, recyclable materials, and plant-based packaging are now widely available, all positioned as more sustainable options. But focusing on materials alone doesn’t tell the full story.
Food waste remains one of the biggest environmental challenges in foodservice, and packaging plays a big role in it. When packaging performs well, it extends shelf life, protects food during transport, and reduces spoilage. When it doesn’t, it contributes to waste on a much larger scale.
That’s where sustainable food packaging decisions are changing. It’s no longer just about what packaging is made from. Now, operators need to consider how well it performs in real conditions and whether it reduces total waste.
So, the question isn’t just which options are available—it's which options will actually work for your business? Let’s help you find out.
When sustainable options first hit the market, decisions were driven by material labels: recyclable, compostable, or paper instead of plastic.
Now we know that the material tells only part of the story…
What matters more is how packaging performs across its lifecycle. That includes how it holds up during use, how it supports food quality, and what happens after disposal.
A recyclable container that becomes contaminated with food residue may never be processed as intended. Compostable packaging only delivers value when commercial composting infrastructure is available, which is still limited in many areas. Even rapidly renewable fiber containers coated to prevent leaking may not be compostable at all.
These materials can be effective solutions, but only when they align with how they’re used and how they’re disposed of. Choosing sustainable food packaging today requires looking beyond the label and evaluating how each option fits your operation’s goals, your waste stream, and your day-to-day realities.
Packaging decisions affect more than just what ends up in our landfills. They play a major role in the consumer’s experience and perception of your product!
When packaging underperforms, the result is often spoiled or damaged food. That increases waste, adds cost, and undermines sustainability goals.
This is why many of the most practical sustainable packaging examples focus on performance:
According to the USDA, 40% of the country’s food supply goes to waste each year5, so there is growing focus on developing packaging that helps extend freshness and reduce spoilage.5 Preventing food waste often delivers a greater environmental benefit than switching materials alone.
Packaging that protects food effectively helps ensure it is consumed rather than discarded. That outcome has a measurable impact.
Cost has been one of the biggest complaints we hear when it comes to adopting sustainable food packaging.
Thankfully, more eco-friendly food packaging options are entering the market, and production is scaling. At the same time, businesses are recognizing the cost implications of waste, spoilage, and inefficient packaging.
Improving packaging performance and reducing waste can contribute to cost savings over time. Thus, sustainability is increasingly being treated as part of an overall operational strategy rather than a separate initiative.
Based on current sustainable packaging trends, successful strategies tend to focus on:
There isn’t a single approach that works for every business. The right solution depends on your products, your customers, and how your operation runs day to day.
Sources: